Completely useless.Īnd then (like much of the rest of the site), the page is just another step towards the real content, but it's hard to figure out what the content is supposed to be. When you can give me a 300dpi display, then and only then, can you use that argument).Īnyhow, once I'm at the right page, there are a number of what appear to be navigation elements that I cannot read because they are a dark text color on a dark green background. (At the convention, it was siggusted that small type sizes work for the Mainstreeter, so they should work for the web site. When I got to the top level survey page, I find that the site has overridden my browser configurations (which is for overall fairly large text), and instead is using some very small font size. it takes too many clicks to get to anyplace useful.Īs an example of all of the above, the message that was sent to announce this survey should have been able to include a simple URL that took you directly to the survey page (instead of top level URL, click here, click here, click here again type of instructions). The navigation is hard to figure out, even for an experienced web user. The site is hard to read (text is too small, contrast is poor). Windows should not be required to properly view all Thank you "WEB CREW" for all the work put into the new web for the NPR The Steam roster was extremely useful for my brother and I to track down information on where several RR artifacts came from. Will there be a way to compensate for this? I think that this could provide useful info HOWEVER only PC savy people will respond and that WILL skew the results. It has a great look, and I find it easy to use. Number Of Responses2 Percentage Of Responses(0%) We should use this for the convention car debate. Line-side equipment (signals, bridges, culverts, etc.) (Note - put only one vote in the 11 column, one vote in the 10 column, one in 9, all the way down to 1 ) On the web site, rate how you would value roster and/or diagram information for these selections: Number Of Responses6 Percentage Of Responses(2%) Number Of Responses16 Percentage Of Responses(5%) Number Of Responses35 Percentage Of Responses(11%) Number Of Responses32 Percentage Of Responses(10%) Number Of Responses48 Percentage Of Responses(15%) Number Of Responses7 Percentage Of Responses(2%) Number Of Responses12 Percentage Of Responses(4%) Number Of Responses62 Percentage Of Responses(20%) Number Of Responses2 Percentage Of Responses(1%) Number Of Responses3 Percentage Of Responses(1%) Number Of Responses1 Percentage Of Responses(0%) Number Of Responses4 Percentage Of Responses(1%) This area will also list whether your license is valid for the security suite, and how many files you have in quarantine.(Enter four digits, i.e. The primary dashboard- Security Status in the left rail-features a large green check mark when the Mac is protected, and a big red “X” when there are issues. The application itself is very straightforward. G Data for Mac Antivirus after finding infections.īoth testing firms found some weaknesses in G Data’s 0-day protection, but it was still good and shouldn’t pose an issue for Mac users wary of becoming an unwitting vehicle for Windows infections. In its real-world protection from February-May with 754 samples of 0-day and unknown malware, G Data blocked 99.1 percent of threats with seven false positives. G Data for Mac earned a 99.4 percent protection rate in May and 100 percent in June forĪV-Test’s 0-day test, and 100 percent in both May and June for the widespread and prevalent malware test.ĪV-Comparatives said G Data blocked 100 percent of Windows malware with three false positives in its malware protection test with more than 10,000 samples in its March 2020 tests. While there isn’t much information about its Mac malware-busting chops, G Data does have a reputation when it comes to Windows malware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |